Template talk:Succession Box: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Years -- To Link or Not== Should the years in the succession box be links or not? Please discuss. ~~~~) |
m (Strangelv moved page Template talk:Succession box to Template talk:Succession Box: Capitalization) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Years -- To Link or Not== | ==Years -- To Link or Not== | ||
Should the years in the succession box be links or not? Please discuss. [[User:Miros1|Miros1]] 01:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | Should the years in the succession box be links or not? Please discuss. [[User:Miros1|Miros1]] 01:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Pros: | |||
:*Inertia: it's already done with the center date linking to the year page | |||
:*Referencing: it's easy for someone browsing to click on it and go to see what else happened that year. | |||
:Cons: | |||
:* It's probably a redundant instance of the link, not that I've been particularly concerned about that. | |||
:--[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 01:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:30, 2 August 2017
Years -- To Link or Not
Should the years in the succession box be links or not? Please discuss. Miros1 01:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Pros:
- Inertia: it's already done with the center date linking to the year page
- Referencing: it's easy for someone browsing to click on it and go to see what else happened that year.
- Cons:
- It's probably a redundant instance of the link, not that I've been particularly concerned about that.
- --Strangelv 01:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)