File talk:LNC Investigatory Committee Report 2024-10-06.pdf

Shouldn't the file be allowed under this policy?

• Is the information relevant to documenting the person's involvement with the LP? If the information only concerns somebody's personal life, or something relating to the person's employment or involvement with some business or organization that has no significant connection with the LP, the simplest way to avoid problems is to not mention it.

Yes, this is relevant to involvement with the LP

• If there has been an allegation of wrong-doing which has not yet been adjudicated, either in a government court or through a process internal to the LP (e.g., Judicial Committee), is there any purpose to be served by mentioning it now, rather than deferring it until the matter has been resolved?

There was an LNC trial

• If there has been a formal finding that somebody has done something wrong, there will typically be some documentation of it.

This is a piece of the documentation

• If a person was suspected or accused of wrongdoing and then was exonerated through some formal process, any previous mention of the matter should be updated in a timely fashion to reflect this exoneration.

This has not (yet) occurred

• If it is necessary to mention an accusation of wrongdoing to adequately reflect the actual history of the person's involvement with the LP, e.g., if knowledge of the matter has already been discussed publicly and this has in turn resulted in consequences that would normally be reported (e.g., removal from a position), then care should still be taken to do so in a way that is as fair as possible to everybody involved. Stick to the facts, and keep in mind that LPedia is not intended as a platform for debate. If there is any dispute about the facts, please refer to the policy on Disputed or Controversial Material for additional guidance.

This has already been made public and discussed elsewhere. The disputed tag could be added to this document. I tried to do so, but can not re-upload the file, so maybe someone else is able to re-upload with the disputed tag.

Additionally, there are other IC reports on this site that have not been removed.

KatM (talk) 13:57, 12 December 2024 (CST)